您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 所属丛书
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索

您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

2021年中国促进国际法治:国内实践

作者:郭玉军 白雪 出版日期:2023年06月 报告页数:32 页 报告大小: 报告字数:29727 字 所属丛书:中国促进国际法治蓝皮书 所属图书:中国促进国际法治报告(2022) 浏览人数: 下载人数:

文章摘要:2021年中国各级法院审结大量涉外案件,总体情况良好,体现了中国涉外司法能力的不断提升。在管辖权方面,跨境金融担保中当事人依据非对称管辖权条款以及非排他管辖条款向内地法院提起诉讼,即使存在平行诉讼,也不影响内地法院行使管辖权等认定案件,以及对区际平行诉讼、商事仲裁与诉讼平行的认定标准及既判力等问题的阐释,具有典型意义。在法律适用方面,法院根据多个法律关系的不同性质,准确查明和分别适用不同的准据法。在外国法院判决承认与执行方面,对违反社会公... 展开

文章摘要:2021年中国各级法院审结大量涉外案件,总体情况良好,体现了中国涉外司法能力的不断提升。在管辖权方面,跨境金融担保中当事人依据非对称管辖权条款以及非排他管辖条款向内地法院提起诉讼,即使存在平行诉讼,也不影响内地法院行使管辖权等认定案件,以及对区际平行诉讼、商事仲裁与诉讼平行的认定标准及既判力等问题的阐释,具有典型意义。在法律适用方面,法院根据多个法律关系的不同性质,准确查明和分别适用不同的准据法。在外国法院判决承认与执行方面,对违反社会公共利益的认定趋于宽松,并不能因适用不同国家法律而判决结果不同,就认定违反我国社会公共利益。在拒绝仲裁裁决的承认与执行案件中,准确解释是否可以援引《阻断外国法律与措施不当域外适用办法》。在仲裁协议效力方面,确立非签署方已达成仲裁合意的情况下应受主协议仲裁条款约束,非涉外合同中约定外籍仲裁员合法有效,体现了司法支持仲裁的理念。同时,在裁判文书中定性不当、适用法律错误的问题依然存在。中国法院应继续服务高水平对外开放,坚持司法支持仲裁,维护中外当事人合法权益。

收起

Abstract:In 2021,Chinese courts at all levels concluded a large number of foreign-related cases,and the overall situation is good,reflecting the continuous improvement of China’s foreign-related judicial capabilities.In terms of jurisdiction,there are some cases of typical significance,such as:the case when the parties involved in cross-border guarantees dispute file lawsuits in mainland courts based on asymmetric jurisdiction clauses a... 展开

Abstract:In 2021,Chinese courts at all levels concluded a large number of foreign-related cases,and the overall situation is good,reflecting the continuous improvement of China’s foreign-related judicial capabilities.In terms of jurisdiction,there are some cases of typical significance,such as:the case when the parties involved in cross-border guarantees dispute file lawsuits in mainland courts based on asymmetric jurisdiction clauses and non-exclusive jurisdiction clauses,even if there is a parallel litigation,it will not affect the exercise of jurisdiction by the mainland courts,the cases involving the interpretation of issues such as interregional parallel litigation,the standards to determine parallel commercial arbitration and litigation and res judicata.In view of application of law,the courts accurately identify and apply different applicable laws according to the different nature of the legal relationships.In the light of the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments,the determination of violation of public social interests tends to be loose,and it is also assumed that the mere application of different national laws which leads to different judgment results does not constitute violation of public social interests.In terms of refusing the recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards,whether the Rules on Counteracting Unjustified Extra-territorial Application of Foreign Legislation and Other Measures can be invoked is accurately explained.In terms of the validity of the arbitration agreement,it is established that if the non-signatory parties have reached an arbitration agreement,they should be bound by the arbitration clause of the master agreement,and the circumstances in which foreign arbitrators are stipulated in non-foreign-related contracts are legal and valid,which reflects the idea of judicial support for arbitration.At the same time,the problems of improper characterization and wrong application of law in the judgment documents still exist.Chinese courts should continue to serve high-level opening up,adhere to the concept of judicial support for arbitration,and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties.

收起

作者简介

郭玉军:郭玉军,武汉大学法学院、教育部重点研究基地武汉大学国际法研究所教授、博士生导师,主要研究领域为国际私法、艺术法、文化遗产保护法和文化产业法。

白雪:白雪,教育部重点研究基地武汉大学国际法研究所博士研究生,主要研究领域为国际私法。