您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 所属丛书
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索

您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

2020年中国促进国际法治:国内实践

作者:郭玉军 白雪 出版日期:2022年12月 报告页数:32 页 报告大小: 报告字数:27540 字 所属丛书:中国促进国际法治蓝皮书 所属图书:中国促进国际法治报告(2021) 浏览人数: 下载人数:

文章摘要:2020年中国涉外案件数量庞大、类型多样,涵盖涉外民事诉讼和涉外仲裁司法监督等方面。在涉外司法审判实践中,智慧法院将涉外审判与互联网司法相结合,体现了中国涉外司法审判质量的长足发展。司法支持仲裁成果显著,法院首次明确境外仲裁机构在我国内地作出的仲裁裁决的性质,确认此类仲裁裁决能够在我国内地直接申请执行。同时,对争诉问题定性存在偏差,没有依法审查和认定案件涉外(涉港澳台)因素等问题依然存在,没有向当事人释明和询问法律适用问题,导致法律适用错... 展开

文章摘要:2020年中国涉外案件数量庞大、类型多样,涵盖涉外民事诉讼和涉外仲裁司法监督等方面。在涉外司法审判实践中,智慧法院将涉外审判与互联网司法相结合,体现了中国涉外司法审判质量的长足发展。司法支持仲裁成果显著,法院首次明确境外仲裁机构在我国内地作出的仲裁裁决的性质,确认此类仲裁裁决能够在我国内地直接申请执行。同时,对争诉问题定性存在偏差,没有依法审查和认定案件涉外(涉港澳台)因素等问题依然存在,没有向当事人释明和询问法律适用问题,导致法律适用错误,对于具有强制适用性的国际条约的适用路径也存在问题。未来中国法院应进一步着力加强司法能力建设,继续坚持支持仲裁,坚持公正司法,提升涉外司法审判质量,保护中外当事人合法权益。

收起

Abstract:By collecting and selecting 28 foreign-related judgment documents issued by Chinese courts in 2020,it can be seen that there are a large number of foreign-related cases in China in 2020,and the types of cases are rich,and the facts of some cases are very complicated;the content of the report covers the jurisdiction of foreign-related civil litigation,the application of law,the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments,an... 展开

Abstract:By collecting and selecting 28 foreign-related judgment documents issued by Chinese courts in 2020,it can be seen that there are a large number of foreign-related cases in China in 2020,and the types of cases are rich,and the facts of some cases are very complicated;the content of the report covers the jurisdiction of foreign-related civil litigation,the application of law,the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments,and judicial supervision of foreign-related arbitration. The practice of foreign-related judicial trials in 2020 reflects the improvement and development of the quality of China’s foreign-related judicial trials,combining foreign-related trials with Internet justice through smart courts. Judicial support for arbitration has achieved remarkable results. For the first time,the court clarified the nature of arbitration awards made by overseas arbitration institutions in Chinese mainland and confirmed that such arbitration awards can be directly applied for enforcement in Chinese mainland. At the same time,problems such as inaccurate qualification of disputes,unreasonable or flawed reasons for the choice of law still exist. It is particularly worthy of concern that there are deviations in the determination of the nature of certain types of cases,errors in the application of laws. There are problems with the application path of the international treaties with compulsory applicability. In the future,Chinese courts should further strengthen judicial capacity building,continue to adhere to the concept of supporting arbitration,uphold fair justice,improve the quality of foreign-related judicial trials,and safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of Chinese and foreign parties.

收起

作者简介

郭玉军:郭玉军,武汉大学法学院、教育部重点研究基地武汉大学国际法研究所教授、博士生导师,主要研究领域为国际私法、艺术法、文化遗产保护法和文化产业法。

白雪:白雪,教育部重点研究基地武汉大学国际法研究所博士研究生,主要研究领域为国际私法。