西田哲学中的现象学问题——以西田对胡塞尔与海德格尔的批判为中心

Abstract:This paper regards Japanese philosopher Nishida Kitaro’s philosophical works as a paradigm in the field of cross-cultural comparative study between the East and the West. Based on Nishida’s critiques of Husserl and Heidegger’s theories，it discusses the phenomenological contents in Nishida’s works. These three philosophers’ theories had similar domains，and Nishida had the similar attitude with Husserl in emphasizing the constitutive principles of cognition. But they held differences in the analysis of the original consciousness structure. Both Nishida and Heidegger criticized Husserl’s phenomenology as focusing on the discussion of intentional objects but ignoring the existing of intentionality itself. His critiques of Heidegger were based only on the period of “Being and Time”，with its methodology and idea of time as objects. Nishida’s critiques of phenomenology at that time were based on his Place Logic whose formation is deeply influenced by Nishida’s meditation activities. His strategy of basing on the East way of thinking but using West way of philosophical expression is worth learning.

收起