您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 所属丛书
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索

您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

《中国-东盟全面经济合作框架协议服务贸易协议》促进了双边服务贸易吗

作者:李凌 出版日期:2017年06月 报告页数:28 页 报告大小: 报告字数:30487 字 所属丛书:海关发展蓝皮书 所属图书:中国海关发展前沿报告(2017) 浏览人数: 下载人数:

文章摘要:一直以来,评估服务贸易自由化协定的实施效果是区域经济一体化领域的一个重要研究议题。本文基于联合国服务贸易数据库的双边贸易总量和分类数据,采用基于倾向得分匹配的双重差分模型(PSM-DID)较为系统地评估了《中国-东盟全面经济合作框架协议服务贸易协议》(以下简称“《协议》”)对中国与东盟国家双边服务贸易的影响。研究表明,从总量上看,《协议》的实施并未有效地促进双边服务贸易的发展。分类估计显示,《协议》促进了中国自东盟国家的版税和许可服务,个人、... 展开

文章摘要:一直以来,评估服务贸易自由化协定的实施效果是区域经济一体化领域的一个重要研究议题。本文基于联合国服务贸易数据库的双边贸易总量和分类数据,采用基于倾向得分匹配的双重差分模型(PSM-DID)较为系统地评估了《中国-东盟全面经济合作框架协议服务贸易协议》(以下简称“《协议》”)对中国与东盟国家双边服务贸易的影响。研究表明,从总量上看,《协议》的实施并未有效地促进双边服务贸易的发展。分类估计显示,《协议》促进了中国自东盟国家的版税和许可服务,个人、文化和休闲服务进口;但对建筑服务的进出口以及保险服务的出口却产生了负面作用。《协议》的开放措施与比较优势、服务贸易提供模式不匹配可能是造成这种情况的原因。后续的服务贸易开放谈判中应着力避免上述问题,以更好地推动区域经济一体化框架下服务贸易的发展。

收起

Abstract:Evaluating the results of implementing the liberalization agreements on of trade in service has always been an important research issue in the field of regional economic integration. Using data from the World Bank’s Trade in Services Database,we adopt the method of Difference-in-Difference combined with propensity matching score(PSM-DID)to systematically estimate the effects of Agreement on Trade in Services of the Framework Agree... 展开

Abstract:Evaluating the results of implementing the liberalization agreements on of trade in service has always been an important research issue in the field of regional economic integration. Using data from the World Bank’s Trade in Services Database,we adopt the method of Difference-in-Difference combined with propensity matching score(PSM-DID)to systematically estimate the effects of Agreement on Trade in Services of the Framework Agreement on Comprehensive Economic Co-operation between the People’s Republic of China And the Association of Southeast Asian Nations(“China-ASEAN Agreement on Trade in Services” in abbreviation)on the bilateral trade in services between China and ASEAN countries. We find no robust evidence that the implementation of China-ASEAN Agreement on Trade in Services promotes the bilateral import and export on aggregated level. Estimation on categorized data shows that the agreement has helped increase China’s import of royalties and license services,as well as personal,cultural and recreational services from ASEAN countries. However,it has negative effects on China’s two-way trade of construction services and the export of insurance services with its ASEAN trade partners. The reason which leads to the above results is that the opening measures in the agreement are consistent with neither China’s comparative advantages nor the dominant mode in which related services are provided. For better promoting the development of trade in service within the framework of regional economic integration,follow-up negotiations are supposed to avoid the above problems.

收起

作者简介

李凌:李凌,上海海关学院经济与工商管理系国际商务教研室主任、讲师。