东盟与非盟安全机制的比较分析

Abstract:Institutionalization is generally measured through three parameters：obligation，precision，and delegation，to which we can refer when the level of security governance of ASEAN and of AU is compared. It is found that the ASEAN Regional Forum is lower institutionalized，while the AU’s Peace and Security Council-centered security architecture is highly institutionalized. The difference between the respective institutional designs lies the different perceptions of threat to their sovereignties. Great powers’ competition constitutes a kind of sovereign threat toward ASEAN member countries，so the ASEAN has developed “non-interference” as a fundamental principle of institutional building in security affairs. Great powers’ competition has been not as intensive in Africa as in East Asia and the sovereign threat in Africa are more related with lack of governing capacity. Therefore，AU is becoming involved in members’ internal issues，and has developed “non-indifference” norms in security affairs.

收起