柏拉图的药(一)
文章摘要:通过细读柏拉图的对话录《斐德若》,德里达展开了对爱欲、修辞、书写、哲学关系的讨论。在这篇著名论文中,德里达更新和加深了对传统柏拉图观念论的物质主义批评。传统的柏拉图主义认为,真理之存在不依赖于且超越于语言指称行为;而作为语言指称行为的典范,书写乃是纯粹的派生物和补充物,同持驻在心灵和展现在言语之中的真理相比,它只有次要的意义。在《斐德若》中,柏拉图借着苏格拉底之口,将“逻各斯”描述为“父亲”“帝王”,享有对书写的威权。书写既是补药又是... 展开
Abstract:Derrida renews and refines the materialist critique of the traditional platonic-idealist position that truth exists apart from and above signification in language,which is considered a merely derivative supplement to the true idea present in the mind or logos.Plato,in The Phaedrus,describes logos as “the Father”and “King”to suggest its authority in relation to writing,which should obediently represent truth but which can also ... 展开