您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 所属丛书
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索

您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

明代漳州府“南门桥杀人”的地学真相与“先儒尝言”——基于明代九龙江口洪灾的认知史考察

作者:李智君 杨芹 出版日期:2016年07月 报告页数:22 页 报告大小: 报告字数:20475 字 所属图书:海洋史研究(第九辑) 浏览人数: 下载人数:

文章摘要:在前科学时代,影响自然科学进步的因素很多,而思想、信仰的影响尤为显著。因为科学的每一次重大进步,首先是思维范式发生转换。而思维范式转换,无一不涉及人们的思想和信仰,特别是宗教信仰。在中世纪欧洲,民众的思想被基督教所禁锢,不能越雷池一步。而在传统中国,由于政治势力的强势,虽然没有出现类似的宗教钳制,但正统学说——儒学的作用绝不下于宗教,因此有学者把中国前科学时代向科学时代的转变过程称为“走出中世纪”。[1]在西方,地学无疑是现代科学中的先... 展开

文章摘要:在前科学时代,影响自然科学进步的因素很多,而思想、信仰的影响尤为显著。因为科学的每一次重大进步,首先是思维范式发生转换。而思维范式转换,无一不涉及人们的思想和信仰,特别是宗教信仰。在中世纪欧洲,民众的思想被基督教所禁锢,不能越雷池一步。而在传统中国,由于政治势力的强势,虽然没有出现类似的宗教钳制,但正统学说——儒学的作用绝不下于宗教,因此有学者把中国前科学时代向科学时代的转变过程称为“走出中世纪”。[1]在西方,地学无疑是现代科学中的先行科学。“日心说”和“地理大发现”瓦解了基督教信仰的基础,使上帝失去了立足之地。在中国,现代地学完全是舶来品,但并不意味着传统地学与儒教之间没有冲突。当这种冲突在某一地方发生,地方政府的官方文献——地方志的文本撰写,如何在地学真相与“先儒尝言”之间做出选择?如果选择了后者,它们又是如何彰显先儒圣明,并掩盖地学真相的?该问题的解决,有助于我们了解传统中国思维范式向现代科学思维范式转换过程中,传统是如何制约现代的。本文选取公共基础设施——桥梁作为研究的切入点,理由有三。其一,桥梁是人与自然的交汇点。众所周知,桥梁是人类与河流斗争

收起

Abstract:In the geo-scientific process of reconstruction of the Jiulong River of Ming Dynasty,the author found that the real “Killing Curse” of Jiulong River flood was the coupling result of various factors,such as climate,regional topography,astronomical tide,storm surge and the distribution of water systems,etc. which was irrelevant with the reconstruction of South Gate bridge in Zhangzhou. However,when the “local saints” Chen Chu... 展开

Abstract:In the geo-scientific process of reconstruction of the Jiulong River of Ming Dynasty,the author found that the real “Killing Curse” of Jiulong River flood was the coupling result of various factors,such as climate,regional topography,astronomical tide,storm surge and the distribution of water systems,etc. which was irrelevant with the reconstruction of South Gate bridge in Zhangzhou. However,when the “local saints” Chen Chun questioned the reasonableness of the site of South Gate bridge,the saying-killing of South Gate Bridge,had been kidnapped by his enormous influence since the Southern Song Dynasty,so that the Records in Ming and Qing Dynasty protected the saying in every possible way. For Zhangzhou South Gate Bridge,local records were convinced of Chen Chun’s remarks rather than delve into the truth of the killing flood. At best,the saying could fool the people who were unaware of the truth only. It wouldn’t cause more serious consequences,because the South Gate Bridge wasn’t the culprit at all. However,once such “superstition” became the intellectuals’ mainstream values,it would kill people’s desire to pursue the truth from the spiritual level. This was not only completely contrary to the spirit of exploring the truth of nature in modern geo-science,but also restricted the origination and development of modern geo-science in traditional China.

收起

作者简介

李智君:作者系厦门大学历史系教授,加拿大维多利亚大学历史系访问学者(2015年8月~2016年8月)。

杨芹:暂无简介