您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

全库
全文
  • 全文
  • 标题
  • 所属丛书
  • 作者/机构
  • 关键词
  • 主题词
  • 摘要
高级检索

您好,欢迎来到一带一路数据库!

欧盟反倾销新规中的“市场扭曲”制度与中国的应对

作者:胡建国 出版日期:2018年07月 报告页数:13 页 报告大小: 报告字数:12649 字 所属丛书:欧洲蓝皮书 所属图书:欧洲发展报告:法、德大选与欧洲一体化的走向(2017-2018) 浏览人数: 下载人数:

文章摘要:第2017/2321号条例确立的欧盟反倾销反补贴新规已于2017年12月20日正式生效。相比于欧盟委员会MES建议,欧盟反倾销反补贴新规并无重大制度性变化,但在某些方面更为完善。“市场扭曲”制度是欧盟反倾销反补贴新规中最为重要的制度创新,包括“严重扭曲”认定机制、国别或行业“严重扭曲”报告机制和特殊的正常价值计算方法等三大基本要素。“市场扭曲”制度一定程度上纳入了环保和劳工标准。《中国经济严重扭曲报告》内容丰富,证明其歧视性存在一定难度,但不应低估其重要... 展开

文章摘要:第2017/2321号条例确立的欧盟反倾销反补贴新规已于2017年12月20日正式生效。相比于欧盟委员会MES建议,欧盟反倾销反补贴新规并无重大制度性变化,但在某些方面更为完善。“市场扭曲”制度是欧盟反倾销反补贴新规中最为重要的制度创新,包括“严重扭曲”认定机制、国别或行业“严重扭曲”报告机制和特殊的正常价值计算方法等三大基本要素。“市场扭曲”制度一定程度上纳入了环保和劳工标准。《中国经济严重扭曲报告》内容丰富,证明其歧视性存在一定难度,但不应低估其重要影响。中国诉欧盟价格比较方法案缓慢推进,中国与欧盟、美国深度博弈WTO诉讼,其他WTO成员的立场可能出现严重分化。建议中国政府积极稳妥地推进针对包括“市场扭曲”制度在内的欧盟相关措施的WTO诉讼。建议中国政府和中国企业密切关注并积极应对欧盟反倾销“市场扭曲”制度的实施,密切跟踪欧盟贸易工具现代化立法中“低税规则”的修订情况并予以适当应对。此外,应当重视《中国经济严重扭曲报告》中提到的“问题”,警惕美欧等发达国家通过包括反倾销工具在内的单边措施予以回应。

收起

Abstract:The Regulation(EU)2017/2321 amending the EU's basic anti-dumping regulation and anti-subsidy regulation came into effect on December 20 2017. Compared to the draft proposal put forward by the European Commission,it makes no great change to the basic designs,but it is more reasonable in many aspects. The most import innovation in Regulation 2017/2321 is the “market distortion”regime,which includes three basic elements: the dete... 展开

Abstract:The Regulation(EU)2017/2321 amending the EU's basic anti-dumping regulation and anti-subsidy regulation came into effect on December 20 2017. Compared to the draft proposal put forward by the European Commission,it makes no great change to the basic designs,but it is more reasonable in many aspects. The most import innovation in Regulation 2017/2321 is the “market distortion”regime,which includes three basic elements: the determination of “significant distortion”,country or industry report of significant distortion and special calculation methodology of normal value. The “market distortion” regime has in a certain degree incorporated the environmental and labor standards. The Chinese Economy Significant Distortion Report issued by the European Commission covered a wide range of fields in Chinese economy and it is difficult to show its discrimination. However,the important implications of this report should not be under-evaluated. In the international arena,the case against EU price comparison methodology(DS516)is progressing slowly,and China,EU and US are contesting in the WTO litigation,while there may potentially be significant splits between other WTO members in their standpoints. The author suggests that Chinese government actively and steadily push forward the relevant WTO litigations against EU,including that against its “market distortion”regime,and that Chinese government and enterprises pay close attention to and respond actively to the implementation of Regulation 2017/2321 and to the amendment of lesser duty rule in the context of the modernization of EU trade defense instruments. In addition,the so-called “problems”mentioned in the Chinese Economy Significant Distortion Report should be taken seriously,particularly in case that the EU and US may take unilateral actions to those “problems”,including by anti-dumping instruments.

收起

作者简介

胡建国:胡建国,南开大学法学院副教授,主要研究国际经济法、世贸组织法和欧盟法。