荻生徂徕及其之前的儒学——以孔子形象为主

Abstract:Li Panlong and Wang Shizhen in Ming China advocated Guwenci（古文辞）as the ideal style of writing. Ogyū Sorai redefined it as a methodology for interpretation of the Confucian classics. Using the method，Sorai established a new theory opposing to such previous schools as Ancient Annotation，New Annotation，and Jinsai Studies. This article clarifies Sorai’s original views in two fields，i.e.，the study of Confucian classics and the image of Confucius，comparing his theory with three other schools.As for the study of Confucian classics，Sorai throughly carried out the criticism which Jinsai began to make against the theory of the correspondence between heaven and man，held by both the Han and the Song Learning，and drew a sharp line between heaven and man. Also，concerning such ideas as “Dao”，“Ji”，and “Jiao/Chuan”，Sorai evaluated the interpretations by the Han scholars as “the theory handed down from ancient times”，and used them as evidence for the validity of his theory.With regard to the image of Confucius，Sorai，referring to the previous interpretations of the Analects in a critical way，created a new figure of the Master consisting of four aspects of “revolutionist”，“inheritor of Guanzhong line”，“preacher”，and “compiler of the six classics”.

收起